Not "adopt AI" — remove expensive routine
Bringing AI into your business · Lesson 1 / 24
The right question
Most failed AI projects start with "where could we apply AI". That's a question about technology, and it produces pilots that demo beautifully and don't survive to the second quarter.
The working question is different: what expensive routine do we have, and would AI remove it. The difference isn't cosmetic — it decides who owns the project. In the first case it's IT or an innovation team; in the second it's a manager with a real problem.
Signs of a good candidate
- Repeats often — dozens or hundreds of times a week. A one-off task won't repay any implementation, however elegant.
- Consumes manual hours. People spend hours on the same action.
- Works on text or data — emails, documents, tickets, reviews, transcripts.
- An error isn't instantly critical. There's room for a human check before the result leaves the building.
- The result is verifiable. You can tell a good output from a bad one — otherwise you can neither tune it nor measure it.
Typical quick wins
- First-line triage and draft replies in support.
- Drafts of emails, proposals, product descriptions.
- Summaries of meetings and long documents.
- Turning reviews and feedback into structure.
- Extracting fields from incoming documents.
Where AI usually doesn't repay
Tasks where an error is expensive and verification is costly. Tasks that happen monthly. Tasks where the real bottleneck isn't the text but the approvals between people — there AI speeds up a step that was never the constraint.
Cheat sheet
- Start with the pain, not the technology.
- Candidate: frequent, manual, text-based, with room to check.
- The result must be verifiable.
- Rare and unverifiable tasks aren't first.
Survey yourself and at least one manager in your company and build a list of 7 routine candidate tasks. For each state: how often it repeats (per week), how many manual hours it takes, whether it works on text or data, and whether the quality of the result can be checked. Mark which candidates you're rejecting and why.